Statistics Don’t Lie - Or Do They?

How something is worded and presented in the world of statistics can be misleading- intentionally or not. Understanding the difference between absolute and relative risk can dramatically increase your chances of making an informed decision.

 Since the CDC and other government agencies are not allowing factual, accurate data (FOIA paperwork accessed has vast amounts of data blocked out) when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine and associated side effects, compared to not receiving their “gene therapy”. It behooves us to try to make sense of what we do know.

 It literally could mean the difference between life and death.

Understanding this concept: fact-checking the fact-checkers

To understand the difference between absolute and relative risk, we can use the following example from a website hosted by Cochrane called Students 4 Best Medicine:

Different ways to measure risk

• Relative risk, also called the risk ratio
• Absolute risk is the overall difference between groups

For example, (see illustration below)

• The relative risk for giving a drug equates to reducing your chances of having a heart attack by 50%, or people not taking the drug are 2X more likely to have a heart attack.
• The absolute risk states only a one percent difference between the two groups.

The above example highlights how a vaccine or any other treatment can look more or less effective by using either relative or absolute risk assessment.

There are so many variables not included in the statistics. And when researching vaccine-related documents, much of the information had been intentionally blacked out in the vaccine reports.

The lack of transparency and accountability

We can, however, try to weed out this mess and make sense of it.

Pfizer claims 95% effective against Covid- what does that mean?

Essentially nothing.

The “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee December 10, 2020” in which Pfizer sought approval for their fast-tracked gene therapy, is a 53-page document, full of impressive charts and carefully crafted wording to muddy the waters.

There are some questions about the integrity of their findings(surprising?)

• Suspected but not confirmed cases of COVID-19 were allowed in both the vaccine and placebo groups. 3410 total- 1597 in the vaccine group, 1816 in the placebo group (see page 42). How can suspected covid patients be allowed in a study? It would be the same as suspected diabetics being allowed to study a new diabetic drug. Whether you are diabetic or not. How can you possibly get a clear picture of the drug effects if you don’t even know the health status of your subjects?
• 311 people in the vaccine category compared to 60 people in the placebo category” had other important protocol deviations. “What deviations? Perhaps an adverse reaction? Nothing was elaborated on what these deviations were. (see page 18)

Blank package inserts

We are left with absolutely no information. Literally.

 The Johnson& Johnson COVID-19 package insert was intentionally left blank. Their lame excuse was that providers and consumers could go to their website for their most up-to-date lies. Perhaps it had something to do with pausing, then restricting then allowing this deadly vax license to expire after the development of blood clots and Guillain-Barre syndrome post-vaccination.

Devastating Health Effects Revealed

Only a few years into this gene therapy and the devastating health effects are showing their ugly heads, especially when it comes to cardiac complications.

• Both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA have been found in human heart muscle at autopsy. (1)

And even more devasting health effects

“Rigorous re-analyses of trial data and post-marketing surveillance studies indicate a substantial degree of modmRNA-related harms than was initially reported. Confidential Pfizer documents had revealed 1.6 million adverse events by August 2022. A third were serious injuries to cardiovascular, neurological, thrombotic, immunological, and reproductive systems, along with an alarming increase in cancers. Moreover, well-designed studies have shown that repeated modmRNA injections cause immune dysfunction, thereby potentially contributing to heightened susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infections and increased risks of COVID-19”. (2)

You have an immune system, let it do its job

Antibodies that block virus spike protein from people who recovered from COVID-19 were found up to 8 months after infection. Of the people who recovered from COVID-19, 95% had immune system memory B cells, the cells that make antibodies. (3)

Detox Naturally

McCullough Protocol Base Spike Detox Trio

Read the groundbreaking study on this detox protocol by Dr. McCullough

This scientifically designed all-natural, non-GMO formula is specifically designed to support your recovery from the damaging effects of spike protein and aid in healing.

• Nattokinase is a proteolytic enzyme with fibrinolytic (anti-clotting) effects, that may maintain a healthy immune system.
• Dandelion root may support cellular defense.
• Selenium may help reduce stress, aiding the body to repair itself and recover.
• Black sativa extract may facilitate cellular repair.
• Green tea extract may add defenses at the cellular level through scavenging for free radicals.
• Irish sea moss is mineral-rich and may help rebuild damaged tissue and muscle.
• Bromelain is a natural antiviral that may prevent the attachment of the spike protein to cells and facilitate its degradation. It may also provide some mild anticoagulant properties.
• Turmeric is anti-inflammatory and can neutralize harmful free radicals in the body.

For cutting-edge, reliable and accurate information you can trust, subscribe to Dr. McCullough’s Substack “Courageous Discourse”

References

1. Seneff S, Wolfinger R, Rose J, Denhaerynck K, Kirsch S, McCullough PA. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign. Cureus. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52876. Retraction in: Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):r137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.r137. PMID: 38274635; PMCID: PMC10810638.
2. McCullough, P. A. (2024, August 8). Breaking publication: COVID-19 modified mRNA "vaccines": Lessons learned from clinical trials, mass vaccination, and the bio-pharmaceutical complex, part 1. Courageous Discourse. https:// substack.com/p/breaking-publication-covid-19-modified
3. National Institutes of Health. (2021, March). How long does protection last after COVID-19? NIH News in Health. https://newsinhealth.nih.gov/2021/03/how-long-does-protection-last-after-covid-19

Written By Brooke Lounsbury