That Steak You Ate Caused the Pandemic
(according to the climate change whackos)
Climate change definition according to the gurus at the U.N.:
“Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Such shifts can be natural, due to changes in the sun’s activity or large volcanic eruptions. But since the 1800s, human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.”
That is a matter of opinion. Their bad science and the quest to profit and take total control of the population through the imaginary carbon footprint and associated policies are the main drivers of climate change.
Their stated goal for climate change is, according to the Whitehouse: To reach 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035. Achieving a net-zero emissions economy by 2050. Delivering 40% of the benefits from federal investments in climate and clean energy to disadvantaged communities.
Our Sovereign Rights are at risk
Eating meat may have caused the pandemic
In a blog written by Dr. Aaron Bernstein, Former Director of Harvard Chan C-CHANGE in regards to COVID-19 and climate change he states:
“Many of the root causes of climate change also increase the risk of pandemics,” and
” Large livestock farms can also serve as a source for spillover of infections from animals to people. Less demand for animal meat and more sustainable animal husbandry could decrease emerging infectious disease risk and lower greenhouse gas emissions.”
“We have many reasons to take climate action to improve our health and reducing risks for infectious disease emergence is one of them.”
Somehow in their twisted psyche, they believe that the pandemic may have been partially caused by consuming meat.
Not to be outdone, a post in the online journal “Science” states that climate change could aggravate more than 50% of known human pathogens. We all know where that path leads. Mandatory vaccinations, social distancing, and closure of businesses that survived the great depression, while smoke, liquor and porn shops remained open.
Oil industry versus electric vehicles
Our sovereign right to drive whatever type of vehicle we want is also at stake. Many states have adopted a “zero carbon emissions” fallacy (policy) that requires the auto industry to discontinue manufacturing gas- and diesel-powered cars within a set timeframe (anywhere from 2030 to 2050, depending on the state) and only manufacture electric vehicles-an unrealistic goal. (33 states have adopted this policy or have legislation on the books)
The electric vehicle versus gas- or diesel-powered vehicles debate- Which is less polluting?
Electric vehicles require lithium batteries. These batteries are creating an ecological disaster- exactly the opposite what the climate change crowd states their goal is.
According to the EARTH-ORG website:
“The additional environmental cost of transporting these batteries results in a higher carbon footprint than ICE vehicles. A 2021 study comparing EV and ICE emissions found that 46% of EV carbon emissions come from the production process while for an ICE vehicle, they ‘only’ account for 26%. Almost 4 tons of CO2 are released during the production process of a single electric car and, in order to break even, the vehicle must be used for at least 8 years to offset the initial emissions by 0.5 tons of prevented emissions annually.” (compared to standard gas-powered vehicles that offset initial production emissions)
“Furthermore, producing one ton of lithium (enough for ~100 car batteries) requires approximately 2 million tons of water, which makes battery production an extremely water-intensive practice. In light of this, the South American Lithium triangle consisting of Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia, experienced heavy water depletion due to intensive lithium extraction in the area. In Chile alone, 65% of the region’s water was used for lithium extraction.” The lithium batteries alone are creating an ecological disaster by draining the region’s water supplies.
Doesn’t sound too eco-friendly, does it?
This tech tackles climate change by spying on you
In this dystopic, video, the climate change propaganda is attempting to make you feel it is normal and good that your smart home regulates your home temperature, lighting, refrigerator temperature, and other smart appliances that connect to the Internet of things. You can control and our right to privacy by allowing these devices in your home. In addition, they admit that your appliances are spying on you.
If the climate change crowd has its way, we will be picking pieces of grasshopper legs out of our teeth, eating solvent-green food, staying home, having our possessions control us, and allowing them to take over the world- one home at a time.
Reclaim your health decisions and body autonomy by taking matters into your own hands. Sign up for one of our Wellness Memberships where you will be in charge of your healthcare decisions and have a healthcare provider that respects and listens to you.
Written By Brooke Lounsbury
